According to this recent article (http://www.informationweek.com/news/services/saas/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207403609), it seems that SAP’s ambitious plan for offering software-as-a-service (SaaS) to the mid-market was just a wee bit too ambitious:
SAP’s SaaS Scaleback
May 7, 2008 · No Comments
→ No CommentsCategories: ERP · LWSN · Landmark
Who’s Minding the Store?
April 29, 2008 · 1 Comment
I know, I know. I pick on Lawson Support too much. Keep reading →
→ 1 CommentCategories: Lawson · Rants · Support
I’ve Been Immortalized!
April 24, 2008 · No Comments
→ No CommentsCategories: Support · Uncategorized
Is there a “LawsonAppliance” in your Future?
March 5, 2008 · No Comments
→ No CommentsCategories: ERP · LWSN · Lawson · Support
Is Lawson Enterprise-Ready?
February 14, 2008 · No Comments
→ No CommentsCategories: ERP · LWSN · Rants
Are You Aligned?
January 7, 2008 · No Comments
We always hear a lot about IT alignment. That is, how aligned your IT goals are with goals of your business? Usually, these are addressed in a macro view, but rarely in micro. But what about within the IT organization itself? Are its goals aligned internally within IT?
→ No CommentsCategories: IT · Upgrades
Should We Keep Lawson?
January 4, 2008 · 1 Comment
It’s an interesting dilemma. A Lawson client asked me why they should continue to use Lawson for their HR software. While they use for Lawson for Financials, they really don’t utilize much of the HR suite:
→ 1 CommentCategories: ERP · S3
Apple’s Stupefying Search Box
December 11, 2007 · 2 Comments
Maybe I’m just not hip enough to get it.
→ 2 CommentsCategories: Rants
More Bandwidth ≠ Greater Productivity
November 21, 2007 · 2 Comments
Business Week published an article, “Ten Penny-Pinching Ideas for 2008″ (http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/nov2007/tc20071120_184990.htm) which got my attention. No, it wasn’t the sarcastic reference to “the best ways to soak your overpriced tech consultants for free advice” in the opening teaser. Keep reading →
→ 2 CommentsCategories: IT · Rants
Whatever Happened to “Upgrade While Active”??
November 8, 2007 · 5 Comments
During the 7.2 -> 8.0 Applications upgrade cycle, Lawson introduced “Upgrade While Active” (at CUE 2003 I think…). This changed the upgrade process to reduce the downtime required to move the data from between application product lines as part of the upgrade.
The 8.0 -> 9.0 Applications were rewritten to use the Java-based sqldbcopy, and table data is copied between product lines/databases directly on the database server rather than the previously-used dump/load method. This, of course, speeds things up dramatically. Keep reading →
→ 5 CommentsCategories: Upgrades

